Car Rental Challenge: Zipcar Vs Enterprise
Posted by MichaelFor the Girl's birthday, I took the day off of work and made some plans. Going out to dinner principle among them. Since we're celebrating, I didn't want to get stuck on the T, especially since we're going to Ten Tables in Jamaica Plain, which is a heck of a T ride for us (over an hour), even though it's just 7 miles away.
So last night, I rented a Zipcar. I got it on their weekday overnight deal, so I paid 35 bucks plus tax. Normally, that would be a 24-hour rental of around 80 bucks. So, Honda CRV for whatever I want to do with it, insurance and gas included, for 35 bucks.
For today, I thought, "I just want to rent during the day, which is more expensive with Zipcar, so I'll try out Enterprise, which is just one T stop away. I can get an economy car for 45 bucks for the day. Pretty good deal compared to 80, am I right?
Okay, so you have to be 25 years old to get that price. It's 20 bucks more for those from 21-24 years of age. But I'm old, so no worries there.
So I hoof it on down to the rental stop and meet my sales guy (I'm used to the impersonal, set-up-on-the-internet-pick-it-up-from-the-parking-lot style of Zipcar), and I'm not really awake. I don't bring a credit card, but I do have my debit card. But that's not okay. I don't have a car, so I don't have insurance. Need a cc to get the car.
No worries, though, as my rep drives me home to grab the card, then drives me back to pick up the car. We spoke mainly about the difference between the two companies, Zipcar and Enterprise. I defended Zipcar, 'cause I love it.
So I'm filling out my forms, and, as it turns out, I need insurance. I opt out of medical and liability because I'm a good driver. Still, it costs me 20 bucks. NOW we're up to 64.96, plus a few other fees. And that's for the cheapest model. Feh.
Okay, so final result: for 10 bucks more, I could have a CRV from Zipcar, just a few blocks from my house, or a Toyota Yaris, which is a tiny car, good for parking on the streets of JP but bad for the coming snowstorm (which I'd link to, but the links will break as the forecast updates. Suffice to say, 8-12 inches, or more).
In my opinion, get Zipcar for those weekday (especially evening) trips, and Enterprise for those weekend getaways.
Inda (A book that SUCKS!)
Posted by Michaelauthor: Sherwood Smith
book published: 2006
Rating: 2
The first thing I have to say about this novel is that it is very much the first in a series. Absolutely nothing was resolved in the end. Nothing at all. In fact, there wasn't much of a story either, which is quite a challenge for over 500 pages.
Here's the rub: I still want to read the next one in the series. A cast of hundreds of points of view, a meandering plot that seemed to jump forward at a ridiculous pace, then slow down just as fast, as if the entire novel is one giant montage. Worked for the movie Fight Club, but does not work here.
Still, I don't want to, but I'm actually considering spending my hard earned dollars on the next in this abyssmal series, which is probably a testament to the author's particular skills.
How can I sum this up for you? There are approximately five novels in here, all summarized wonderfully, but losing their power in the summary. I don't want to spoil it for you, because I am definitely recommending this for hard-core fantasy readers, who often read so much and so fast that this novel/series would be perfect for them. Let's just say that it feels like Sherwood Smith started a novel, got bored with it, and hit the fast-forward button on her word-processor to get to the next section.
I guess that would be fine, if it weren't for the fact that the author never actually settles on a story to tell. We just keep pinging all over the place, to the effect that we, as readers, are never truly invested in what's going on in the story, and simply keep reading to see what happens next. Sherwood tries to build suspense, but I have a hard time caring because the characters have not had time to evolve in my mind, and therefore I really don't give a shit that they're in danger.
I think I've made my point, so let's move on to craft, something that makes or breaks a review for me.
As far as I can tell, Sherwood Smith has never been trained to write. At a sentence level, it's obvious that Smith is quite enamored with language, and likes to throw in volumously poetic phrases to end chapters or sections using some sort of a literary bang. But it's a gimmick: the blatant attempt at manipulation is insulting to mean. I more often roll my eyes than say, "How perfect." That's what should be the author's principle concern: not what sounds pleasant or is neat, but what fits the story. And the story is so completely barebones that these literary indulgences seem completely out of place, like Paris fashions at a PTA meeting. I stole that from a commercial.
The world does not really hold together, with its unexplainedly accepting sexual mores, its strange equality amonst the sexes. I admit that it is a refreshing change from the unremittingly masculine fantasy of most spec-fic, but it's just so polished and pretty that's it's almost passive-aggressive. The internal and external politics are less than intuitive, and constantly bashed over the reader's head. I'll let you decide on that one.
Let me reiterate the fact that NOTHING IS EVER AT STAKE. The main character(s) goals are constantly thwarted, but only as plotpoints. Inda never fails, never has to learn from his failures, is always perfect from his extreme youth through his teens. He just always succeeds. For God's sake, Horatio Hornblower suffered less success in his own storied career.
What saves this novel from the dismal depths of a 1 is the simple fact that, despite hating the book and never being able to read it for even the short train ride from my work to my house, I still want to find out what happens next. I must be a little masochistic. Read this if you read quickly and voraciously, as it passes the time. Bear in mind, it's definitely a book for teenagers.
2 out of 6
A Bit More on the Spending Freeze
Posted by MichaelWe're 10 days into the official spending freeze (Jan 15 - March 15). There've been ups and downs -- strikes and gutters.
First off, I really, really want to go to a Chinese buffet. Like, bad. There's a great one not two blocks from my house, and I love it there, and they know me. But no.
I also really want to go see a movie. There are quite a few out right now: Daybreakers; Avatar; is the Book of Eli out yet? But NO.
On the other side of it, I have paid off my Best Buy credit card already. It wasn't that much, but now I'm not paying that with every paycheck. Other than that, though, I'm not exactly rolling in the dough.
I have managed to make a few large steps toward leaving Citizens Bank (details to follow in a later blog, perhaps), but now my money is divided.
On the weight-loss front, it keeps going. I'm below 180 pounds for the first time since leaving Texas, on my way to the Wedding goal of 170 or below (9 months to go).
I have slipped up a time or two; I eat when I get sick. One day, I just didn't bring enough with me to work. I needed a soda and some snacks.
I also bought a hair-catcher for the tub, but since it's cheaper than the Foaming Pipe Snake, I'd say it's allowed.
Spending Freeze
Posted by MichaelThe girl and I spent waaaaay too much money over the holidays. Most of it came via my credit card, which is now approaching its limit. With the wedding a scant 10 months away and her going back to school, money's tight.
So we're on a spending freeze.
It works like this:
For two months, we purchase nothing but food and other essentials (and pay bills). We can go out with friends once per month and out on a date night once per month.
To help out, we plan our meals for the week on Sunday or Monday, along with who's going to cook them, and purchase what we need. Food Network and Cooking Light are great helps with this.
In addition, I've given up High Fructose Corn Syrup (don't believe the adds, that shit makes you fat), and on account of my speech impediment drastically worsening, I have been put off of artificial sweeteners, as well.
What else is out:
- Amazon.com - a great love of mine, and the source of most of my books
- Home Depot - I am a sucker for starting new projects and I love building stuff.
- Snacks - Usually impulse buys, therefore cannot be purchased
- Other things that will surely come up in the next 8 weeks or so.
Results so far:
A bit of cash saved, we'll see how much can go to the credit card bill after 8 weeks
Lost 2 pounds.
The weight loss is unexpected, but inevitable. No snacks, no going out to eat, healthy food at home. But, honestly, I started this out as a way to save money. Now it looks like I won't have to join weight watchers, after all.
MORE money saved, right there.
Another Horrible Fantasy Novel
Posted by MichaelReview by Michael
title: The Summoner: Book One in the Chronicles of the Necromancer
author: Gail Z. Martin
book published: 2007
rating: 1
read at: 2009/06/04
I can't tell what was greater: how insulted or how disgusted I was by this book. Not by the content (saccharin prince with evil brother forced from his birthright... um, something about ghosts). No, the writing is, to be blunt, shit.
I have rules that I live by, that define what I believe is a good book. Want to know what they are? The opposite of everything that this book is.
Anyone here want to read about 12th century characters with 20th century values stapled to their paper-thing character development? How about needless expositions placed within dialogue to make the dialogue make sense? I certainly don't.
I didn't make 50 pages in this book. I ride the T a scant 15 minutes in my daily commute, but even that was too long of a time to be cooped up with this book. Thank god a good chunk of the trip is above ground, or I'd have had nothing to look at. In less than 50 pages, I put the book down and never looked back. Waste of 8 bucks, I don't mind telling you.
Alternative: The Lies of Locke Lamora by Scott Lynch. This is a book I cannot put down.
Rating for The Summoner:
1 out of 6
Only people who don't care at all about how a story is told will enjoy this novel. Stay away.
Jitterbug Perfume
Posted by MichaelReview by Michael
author: Tom Robbins
book published: 1984
rating: 2
read at: 2009/09/01
Review:
Tom Robbins uses puns, great language, and an odd idea, just like all his other books, but this one falls short of the mark.
It's just... too long. It's full -- and I mean full -- of diatribes by characters that appear to be thinly-veiled musings by the author himself. The reader is given one heluva strange worldview, which is kinda neat, I guess, but I got bored with it pretty much right away.
It starts out way back with a Roman-era barbarian king, which should be awesome, and it is, at first. I won't spoil it for you, because it may be worth picking up if you have nothing else to do.
The novel quickly loses pace, getting mired in its incessant need to fill us in on some sort of olfactory revelation or other.
In the end, it gets a resounding "eh" from yours truly.
Not terrible, just not recommended. Pick up Skinny Legs and All or Fierce Invalids Home from Hot Climates. They're much better.
Gil’s All Fright Diner
Posted by MichaelReview by Michael.
author: A. Lee Martinez
average rating: 3.84
book published: 2005
read at: 2009/05/01
review:
A vampire and a werewolf walk into a diner...
and an awesome book ensues.
I heard this book was not as good as the newer ones, which I loved as well, but this one if far superior. The humor is less forced, more natural in its delivery, and the writing is damned good, especially for a debut.
This is not high art, unless you consider entertainment art. But it is a simple, good read, something that makes the commute fly by, something that you'd take on a plane and not worry about the turbulence. I'd compare A. Lee Martinez to Terry Pratchett, but only because they're SpecFic writers who make me laugh, and endlessly entertain.
Anyone who has eyes and a brain, and can connect the two together enough to process abstract concepts like letters that combine together to stand for the sounds that mean words will love this book.
5 out of 6
Taken from my Goodreads blog.
Do not read this book. Read this review instead.
Posted by MichaelReview by Michael
Stephen R. Donaldson, Andrew Leonard, David Drake, Paula Guran, Jacquline Carey, Glen Cook and Elizabeth Haydon ARE ALL LIARS. This book is only good if you're 12 years old and think of people as paper-thin and totally devoid of complex thought and emotion. I call these characters weathervane characters, and they are now a strong part of the pantheon of horribly written, pointless characters who exist only as tiny outgrowths of DEUS EX MACHINA, and since many of the characters are actually "agents" of actual gods in this realm, it's not just an empty phrase.

Makes your commute longer.
I will leave you, for example's sake, the Adjunct. She randomly feels guilty about being who she is, but only as heavy-handed, internal monologue that never results in any impact, whatsoever, on the story itself. Let me tell you aspiring authors out there: false and forced contradictions make the characters thinner, not more real. We can't get a gauge on her motivations. We can't thrill or chafe in her victories because we've no idea where we stand. Also, she ends up not changing, and she's a very, very good example of the kinds of characters in this book: a version of what a dishonest writer believes a character SHOULD be like, instead of letting them flow naturally from their own motivations.
I read this book to the end, only because I wanted to write an honest review. I hated this book. It insulted me. My money was wasted on this book, and people who think that books like this are good are the reason that fantasy fiction sucks most of the time.
This book is horrid, and the only reason to read it is if you have no standards.
1 out of 6
Taken from my Goodreads blog.



